Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Pradhan, Rajat Kumar
- A Prelude to Meta-Evolution
Abstract Views :197 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Zoology, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak - 756100, Odisha, IN
2 Department of Physics, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak - 756100, Odisha, IN
1 Department of Zoology, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak - 756100, Odisha, IN
2 Department of Physics, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak - 756100, Odisha, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 11, No 31 (2018), Pagination: 1-13Abstract
Objectives: To propose a single unified theory of evolution of life and of species based on conscious evolutionary urge that works at all levels, from the individual to the cosmic. Methods: We review and analyze of all major theories of evolution of life and of species to figure out unanswered questions and to bring forth the possible role of an inherent evolutionary urge in every being and in every species. The evolutionary urge is made operationally active by the proposed fundamental and key role of the cosmic mind. Findings: The cosmic mind as the repository of all mental events of all beings, having as subsets the collective minds of all species, provides an adequate structure to explain evolution of life as well as of species as an effect of the corresponding evolutionary urges inherently present. It stores, regulates and activates the evolutionary urges in beings and species and thus is the source and substratum of all evolution. The morphogenetic field is proposed to play the role of an intermediary between the cosmic mind and the physical world. It is through this morphogenetic field that the urges in individual mind or collective mind or cosmic mind are projected unto the physical world. Many evolutionary isms and paradigms stand unified in the cosmic mind. Application/Improvements: The urge-based approach to evolution can explain adaptation and mutation and also points out possible directions of evolution beyond the Homo sapiens.References
- Darwin C. The origin of species, 6th Edition. John Murray: London. 1872. PMid:28995415 PMCid:PMC5132969
- Dobzhansky T. Nothing in Biology Makes Sense except in the Light of Evolution. The American Biology Teacher. 1973 Mar; 35(3):125-9. https://doi.org/10.2307/4444260.
- Lamarcke JB. Philosphic Zoologique, Dentu et L’Auteur: Paris. 1809.
- Weismann A. Germ-plasm: A theory of Heredity. Bristol : Thoemmes Press. 1893; p. 1-447.
- Auerbach C. Chemical mutagens: alkylating agents I: Genetical effects. Mutation research. Springer: Boston, MA. 1976; p. 256-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-31030_15.
- Majerus MEN. Industrial melanism in the peppered moth. Biston betularia: An Excellent Teaching Example of Darwinian Evolution in Action. Evolution: Education and Outreach. 2009 Mar; 2(1):63-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12052-008-0107-y.
- Muller HJ. The Measurement of Gene Mutation Rate in Drosophila, Its High Variability, and Its Dependence upon Temperature. Genetics. 1928 May; 13(4):1-279.
- De Vries H. Species and Varieties: their Origin by Mutation, 2nd Edition. Chicago: Open Court Publishing. 1906; p. 1-847.
- Huxley J. Evolution: the modern synthesis, 3rd Edition. George Allen and Unwin, London. 1963.
- Jablonka E, Lamb JM. Soft inheritance challenging the modern synthesis, Genetics and molecular biology. 2008; 31(2):389-95. https://doi.org/10.1590/S141547572008000300001.
- Pigliucci M. Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution. 2007 Dec; 61(12):2743-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00246.x. PMid:17924956
- Pigliucci M, Muller GB. Evolution-the extended synthesis, MIT Press: Cambridge, USA. 2010; p. 1-504. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262513678.001.0001.
- Muller GB. Why an extended evolutionary synthesis is necessary. Interface Focus. 2017 Oct; 7(5):0015.
- Voje KL, Holen OH, Liow LH, Stenseth NC. The role of biotic forces in driving macroevolution: beyond the Red Queen. Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 2015 Jun; 282(1808):2015-0186.
- Van Valen L. A New Evolutionary Law. Law Evolutionary Theory. 1973 July; 1:1-30.
- Dobzhansky T, Pavlovsky O. An experimental study of interaction between genetic drift and natural selection. Evolution. 1957 Sep; 11(3):311-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1957.tb02900.x.
- Jablonski D. Micro- and Macro-evolution: Scale and Hierarchy in Evolutionary Biology and Paleobiology. Paleobiology. 2000 July; 26(4):15-52. https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2000)26[15:MAMSAH]2.0.CO;2.
- Huxley TH. Hardwicke’s Science Gossip. London. 1867; 3:74-5.
- Sheldrake R. Three approaches to biology part -1. The mechanistic theory of life. Theoria to theory. 1980; 14:125-44.
- Robinson WS. Evolution and epiphenomenalism. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2007 Jan; 14(11):27-42.
- Grandpierre A. Cosmic life forms. From fossils to astrobiology. Springer Science: New York. 2008; p. 269-385.
- Bergson H. Matter and Memory. Allen and Unwin: London. 1911.
- Becker RO, Selden G. The Body Electric. Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life. Quill, William Morrow: New York. 1985.
- Burr HS, Northrop ESC. The Electrodynamic Theory of Life. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 1935 Sep; 10:1-322. https://doi.org/10.1086/394488.
- Driesch H. History and theory of vitalism. Macmillan: London. 1914. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.88054.
- Butler S. The deadlock in Darwinism. The humour of Homer and other essays. Books for libraries press: NY. 1967; p. 253-4.
- Gandpierre A, Chopra D, Kafatos MC. The Universal Principle of Biology, Neuroquantology. 2014 Sep; 12(3):346-73.
- Waddington CH. The strategy of the genes, Allen and Unwin: London. 1957.
- Thom R. Structural stability and morphogenesis. Benjamin Reading: Mass. 1975.
- Thom R. From a model of science to a science of models. Theoria to theory. 1977 Mar; 10(4):287-302.
- Sheldrake R. A New Science of Life. Blond and Briggs Ltd, London. 1981.
- Whitehead AN. Science and the modern world. Cambridge university press: Cambridge. 1926.
- Haldane JS. Mechanism, life and personality: An examination of the mechanistic theory of life and mind, 2nd Edition. John Murray: London. 1921.
- Morgan CL. Emergent evolution. Henry Holt and co: New York. 1923.
- Wallace AR. Theory of life: a manifestation of creative power, direction mind and ultimate purpose. New York: Moffat, Yard & Company. 1911.
- Hunter J, Owen R. Essays and observations on natural history anatomy physiology psychology and geology. J. Van Voorst: London. 1861, 2. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.61787.
- Reid RGB. Evolutionary Theory: The Unfinished Synthesis. Cornell Univ. Press: Ithaca. 1985. https://doi.org/10.1086/414957.
- Reid RGB. Biological Emergences: Evolution by Natural Experiment. MIT Press: Mass. 2007; p. 1-30. PMCid:PMC2658516
- Barrett PH, Gautrey PJ, Herbert S, Kohn D, Smith S. Charles Darwin’s notebooks, 1836-1844: Geology, transmutation of species, metaphysical enquiries. British Museum (Natural History); Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 1987.
- Grandpierre A. The Physics of Collective Consciousness. World Futures. The Journal of general Evolution. 1997; 48(1-4):23-56.
- Jung CG. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Collected Works. Carl Gustav Jung; William Mcguire. 1969; 9:43-4.
- Martin F, Carminati F, Carminati G. Quantum Information, oscillations and the Psyche. Physics of Particles and Nuclei. 2010 May; 41(3):425-51. https://doi.org/10.1134/ S1063779610030032.
- Martin F, Carminati F, Carminati GG. Quantum information theory applied to unconsciousness and consciousness. Neuro Quantology. 2013 Mar; 11(1):16-33. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2013.11.1.628.
- Pradhan RK. Subject object duality and the states of consciousness: a quantum approach. Neuro Quantology. 2010 Sep; 8(3):262-78. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2010.8.3.292.
- Eccles JC. Do mental events cause neural events analoguosly to the probability fields of quantum mechanics? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 1986 May; 227(1249):411-28. https:// doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1986.0031. PMid:2873576
- Manousakis E. Founding Quantum Theory on the basis of Consciousness. Foundations of Physics. 2006 Jun; 36(6):795-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9049-9.
- Eddington AS. The Nature of the Physical World. Macmillan: NY, USA. 1929.
- Eddington AS. The Philosophy of Physical Science. Macmillan: New York, NY, USA. 1939.
- Pockett S. The electromagnetic field theory of consciousness: a testable hypothesis about the characteristics of conscious as opposed to non-conscious field. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2012 Dec; 19(11-12):191-223.
- McFadden J. The conscious electromagnetic information (CEMI) field theory: The Hard Problem Made Easy? Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2002 Aug; 9(8):45-6.
- Dennett DC. Evolution, Teleology, Intentionality: Reply to Ringen and Bennett. (Continuing commentary on “Precis of The Intentional Stance”). Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1993 June; 16(2):289-391. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0140525X00030697.
- Darwin C. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, John Murray: London, 1871; 1:1-423.
- Ponte DV, Schafer L. Carl Gustav Jung, Quantum Physics and the Spiritual Mind: A Mystical Vision of the TwentyFirst Century. Behavioral Sciences. 2013 Dec; 3(4):601-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs3040601. PMid:25379259 PMCid:PMC4217602
- Sheldrake R. The Presence of the Past. Morphic Resonance and the Habits of Nature. Vintage Press: London. 1988; p. 1-391.
- Jung CG. Psychlogy of the Unconscious. A Study of the Transformations and Symbolisms of the Libido. New York: Doddy, Mead and Company. 1916; p. 27-8.
- Burggren W. Epigenetic inheritance and its role in evolutionary biology: Re-Evaluation and new perspectives. Biology (Basel). 2016 Jun; 5(2):24-46. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology5020024. PMid:27231949 PMCid:PMC4929538
- Remine WJ. The Biotic Message: Evolution Versus Message Theory, 1st Edition. Saint Paul Science. 1993; p. 1-538.
- The Ubiquitousness of Prey-Predator Relationship (PPR), the Law of Purposive Association and Fundamental Questions in Evolution
Abstract Views :245 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Zoology, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak -756100, Odisha, IN
2 Department of Physics, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak- 756100, Odisha, IN
1 Department of Zoology, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak -756100, Odisha, IN
2 Department of Physics, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak- 756100, Odisha, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 11, No 32 (2018), Pagination: 1-11Abstract
Objectives: To generalize Prey-Predator Relationship (PPR) so that entire evolutionary process can be interpreted as a chain of Prey-Predator Relationships working by a law of mutual purposive association. Methods: Analysis and generalization of Prey-Predator Relationship, Meta-evolutionary analysis of evolution of life as well as of species using generalized Prey-Predator Relationship. Findings: The evolutionary urge proceeding from the cosmic mind manifests in the nonliving resulting in emergence of life and in the living leading to evolution of species. Progressive evolution of humans and beyond the human stage by the generalized Prey-Predator Relationship operating in the domain of the mind to gradually eliminate instinct and intellect leading to evolution of intuition. Successive evolutionary stages are found to be atom-molecule, moleculemacromolecule, macromolecule-life, life-instinct, instinct-intellect and intellect-intuition in that order. Certain important commonalities like common phylum etc. are found to be the bases of purposive association. Both prey and predator evolve through their relationship. Applications/Improvements: We generalize Prey-Predator Relationships to include elimination of qualities or traits rather than mere consumption of prey by the predator. We propose a law of purposive association to explain evolution of life from non-living and the entire course of evolution of species up to the human stage and beyond.References
- Koeslag JA. Population homeostasis. South African Medical Journal. 1978 Feb; 53(6):222–4. PMid: 653514.
- Dash MC. Fundamentals of ecology. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill; 2001. p. 1–525. PMid:17851153.
- Nilsson KA, Lundback S, Postavnicheva-Harri A, Persson L. Guppy populations differ in cannibalistic degree and adaptation to structural environments. Oecologia. 2011 Oct; 167(2):391–400. PMid: 21516310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-1990-4.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. A prelude to Metaevolution. International Journal of Science and Technology. 2018.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. Role of evolutionary urge in epigenetics and Gene culture co-evolution: A meta-evolution Perspective. International Journal of Science and Technology. 2018.
- Mougi A, Iwasa Y. Evolution towards oscillation or stability in a predator-prey system. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2010 Oct; 277(1697):3163–71.
- Dobzhansky T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher. 1973 Mar; 35(3):125–9. https://doi.org/10.2307/4444260.
- Pattee HH. The complementarity principle in biological and social structures. Journal of Social and Biological Structures. 1978 Apr; 1(2):191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1750(78)80007-4.
- Gould SJ. The paradox of the first tier: An agenda for paleobiology. Paleobiology. 1985; 11(1):2–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300011350.
- Gould SJ. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap; 2002.
- Vermeij GJ. Evolution and escalation. An Ecological History of Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1987. p. 1–527.
- Abrams PA. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: Theory and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 2000 Nov; 31:79–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.79.
- Dawkins R, Krebs JR. Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B.1979 Oct; 205(1161):489–511. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0081.
- Thompson JN. Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 1998 Aug; 13(8):329–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01378-0.
- Agrawal AA, Laforsch C, Tollrian R. Transgenerational induction of defences in animals and plants. Nature. 1999 Sep; 401(6748):60–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/43425.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. Subjective time in neuropsychology vis-a-vis the objective time of physics. Neuro Quantology. 2018.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. Neural recruitment, information processing and the equation for subjective time. Neuroquantology. 2018.
- Becker RO, Selden G. The body electric: Electromagnetism and the foundation of life. 1st Ed. New York: Quill, William Morrow; 1998. p. 1–368.
- Burr HS, Northrop ESC. The electrodynamic theory of life. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 1935 Sep; 10(3):322–33. https://doi.org/10.1086/394488.
- Pockett S. The electromagnetic field theory of consciousness: A testable hypothesis about the characteristics of conscious as opposed to non-conscious field. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2012 Dec; 19(11-12):191–223.
- Sheldrake R. The presence of the past: Morphic resonance and the habits of nature. London: Vintage Press; 1988. p. 1–391.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. A critical analysis on unusual prey predator relationships with regard to their exclusive evolutionary advantages. 2018.
- Kitchell JA. Biotic interactions and siliceous marine phytoplankton: An ecological and evolutionary perspective. Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossils Benthic Communities. New York: Plenum; 1983. p. 285–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0740-3_7.
- Signor PWG, Vermeij GJ. The plankton and the benthos: Origins and early history of an evolving relationship. Paleobiology. 1994; 20(3):297–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300012793.
- Verity PG, Smetacek V. Organism life cycles, predation and the structure of marine pelagic ecosystems. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1996 Jan; 130:277–93. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps130277.
- Butterfield NJ. Plankton ecology and the Proterozoic– Phanerozoic transition. Paleobiology. 1997; 23(2):247–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S009483730001681X.
- Smetacek V. A watery arms race. Nature. 2001 Jun; 411(6839):1–745. PMid: 11459035. https://doi.org/10.1038/35081210.
- Lee DH, Severin K, Ghadiri MR. Autocatalytic networks: The transition from molecular self-replication to molecular ecosystems. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 1997 Dec; 1(4):491–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(97)80043-9.
- Nathan MJ. Molecular ecosystems. Biology and Philosophy. 2014 Jan; 29(1):101–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539013-9400-4.
- Chignola R, Dai Pra P, Morato L, Siri P. Proliferation and death in a binary environment: A stochastic model of cellular ecosystems. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 2006 Oct; 68(7):1661–80. PMid: 16967258. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11538-006-9078-8.
- Balinsky BI. An introduction to embryology. 5th Ed. Cengage Learning. 2012. PMid: 21800038.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. Methylation-assisted epigenetic evolution and the psycho-biology of human experiences. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development. 2018.
- Role of Evolutionary Urge in Epigenetics and Gene Culture Co-Evolution:A Meta-Evolution Perspective
Abstract Views :223 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Zoology, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak–756100, Odisha, IN
2 Department of Physics, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak–756100, Odisha, IN
1 Department of Zoology, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak–756100, Odisha, IN
2 Department of Physics, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak–756100, Odisha, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 11, No 32 (2018), Pagination: 1-10Abstract
Objectives: We wish to provide a meta-evolutionary basis for epigenetics and gene-culture co-evolution which lie beyond current evolutionary paradigms. We wish to give detailed mechanisms of action of the evolutionary urge that is responsible for all adaptations and hence of all evolution.Methods: We review recent developments in epigenetics and gene-culture co-evolution to explain in detail how exactly the evolutionary urge operates at all levels from a meta-evolution perspective. Findings: Adaptive urge leads to epigenetic marks which accumulate on the epigenome resulting ultimately in mutations in DNA, thereby causing morphological modifications. The epigenetic marks are the key intermediaries between the adaptive urges and the mutations. New adaptive urges get encoded into the epigenome and facilitate gene-culture co-evolution and speciation. The fundamental core of all evolution is the urge for survival, freedom and joy. Applications/Improvements: The fundamental proposal of meta-evolution theory is that the reason behind adaptive evolution is the evolutionary urge, which is lodged in the psyche of the individual. Intensity of urge determines the success or failure in adaptation.Fine structure of definite urges like cognitive urge, respiratory urge, locomotive urge, reproductive urge and urge for food etc. help explain the development of complexity ofcorresponding organs in the species.References
- Darwin C. The Descent of man and selection in relation to sex. A reprint of the second edition. John Murray: London; 1913. p. 195–224.
- Aldrich HE, Hodgson GM, Hull DL, Knudsen T, Mokyr J, Vanberg VJ. In defence of generalized Darwinism. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2008 Oct; 18(5):577–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0110-z
- Hull DL. Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. University of Chicago Press: Chicago; 1988.p. 1–586. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226360492.001.0001. PMid:3052090 PMCid:PMC1880658
- Hull DL. Science and selection: Essays on biological evolution and the philosophy of science. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 2001. p. 1–24.
- Lewontin RC. The Triple Helix: Gene, organism and environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; 2000. p. 1–9.
- Portin P. A comparison of biological and cultural evolution. Journal of Genetics. 2015 Mar; 94(1):155–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-015-0482-4. PMid:25846892
- Cavallaro S, D’Agata V, Manickam P, Dufour F. Alkon DL. Memory-specific temporal profiles of gene expression in the hippocampus, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2002 Dec; 99(25):16279–84. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.242597199. PMid:12461180 PMCid:PMC138602
- Rampon C, Jiang CH, Dong H, Tang YP, Lockhart DJ, Schultz PG, Tsien JZ, Hu Y. Effects of environmental enrichment on gene expression in the brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2000 Nov; 97(23):12880–4. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.23.12880. PMid:11070096 PMCid:PMC18858
- Darwin C. The origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. 1859. Reprint, London: Penguin; 1968.
- Pigliucci M. Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution. 2007 Dec; 61(12):2743–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00246.x. PMid:17924956
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. A Prelude to meta-evolution. Indian Journal of Science and Technology; 2018.
- Feinberg AP. Epigenetics at the epicenter of modern medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2008 Mar; 299(11):1345–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.299.11.1345. PMid:18349095
- Osborne A. The role of epigenetics in human evolution. Bioscience Horizons: The International Journal of Student Research. 2017 Jan; 10(1):07–07.
- Slotkin RK, Martienssen R. Transposable elements and the Epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nature reviews Genetics. 2007 Apr; 8(4):272–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nrg2072. PMid:17363976
- Alkorta-Aranburu G, Beall CM, Witonsky DB. The genetic architecture of adaptations to high altitude in Ethiopia. PLoS Genetics. 2012 Dec; 8(12):e1003110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003110. PMid:23236293 PMCid: PMC3516565
- Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Spencer HG. Predictive adaptive responses and human evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2005 Oct; 20(10):527–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.001. PMid:16701430
- Hernando-Herraez I, Heyn H, Fernandez-Callejo M. The interplay between DNA methylation and sequence divergence in recent human evolution. Nuclear Acids Research.2015 Sep; 43(17):8204–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/ gkv693. PMid:26170231 PMCid:PMC4787803
- Heyn H, Moran S, Hernando-Herraez I. DNA methylation contributes to natural human variation. Genomic Research. 2013 Sep; 23(9):1363–72. https://doi.org/10.1101/ gr.154187.112. PMid:23908385 PMCid:PMC3759714
- Badyaev AV. Epigenetic resolution of the ‘curse of complexity’ in adaptive evolution of complex traits. The Journal of Physiology. 2014 Jun; 592(11):2251–60. https:// doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2014.272625. PMid:24882810 PMCid:PMC4048085
- Giuliani C, Bacalini MG, Sazzini M. The Epigenetic side of human adaptation: Hypotheses, evidences and theories. Annals of Human Biology. 2014 Nov; 42(1):1–9. https:// doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2014.961960. PMid:25413580
- Tobi EW, Lumey LH, Talens RP. DNA methylation differences after exposure to prenatal famine are common and timing-and sex-specific. Human Molecular Genetics. 2009 Aug; 18(21):4046–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ ddp353. PMid:19656776 PMCid:PMC2758137
- Feinberg AP, Tycko B. The history of cancer Epigenetics. Nature Reviews. Cancer. 2004 Feb; 4(2):143–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1279. PMid:14732866
- Hubisz MJ, Pollard KS. Exploring the genesis and functions of Human Accelerated Regions sheds light on their role in human evolution, Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 2014 Dec; 29:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2014.07.005. PMid:25156517
- Mesoudi A, Whiten A. The multiple roles of cultural transmission experiments in understanding human cultural evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2008 Nov; 363(1509):3489–501. https://doi.org/10.1098/ rstb.2008.0129. PMid:18801720 PMCid:PMC2607337
- Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Myles S. How culture shaped the human genome: Bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2010 Feb; 11(2):137–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2734. PMid:20084086
- Aoki K. The theoretical and empirical aspects of gene-culture co-evolution. Theoretical Population Biology. 2001; 59(4):253261. https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.2001.1518. PMid:11560446
- Moalem S, Storey KB, Percy ME. The sweet thing about Type 1 diabetes: A cryoprotective evolutionary adaptation. Medical Hypotheses. 2005; 65(1):8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2004.12.025. PMid:15893109
- Ingram CJE, Mulcare CA, Itan Y. Lactose digestion and the evolutionary genetics of lactase persistence. Human Genetics. 2009 Jan; 124(6):579–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00439-008-0593-6. PMid:19034520
- Feldman MW, Laland KN. Gene culture co-evolutionary theory. Tree. 1996 Nov; 11(11):453–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)10052-5
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. Methylation-assisted epigenetic evolution and the psycho-biology of human experiences. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development; 2018.
- Frazer KA. Decoding the human genome. Genome Research. 2012 Sep; 22(9):1599–601. https://doi.org/10.1101/ gr.146175.112. PMid:22955971 PMCid:PMC3431476
- Bergson H. Matter and memory. Goerge Allen and Unwin: London; 1911.
- Bergson H. Creative evolution. Henry Holt and Co: London; 1911.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. Neural recruitment, information processing and the equation for subjective time. Neuroquantology; 2018.
- Pockett S. The electromagnetic field theory of consciousness: a testable hypothesis about the characteristics of conscious as opposed to non-conscious field. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2012 Dec; 19(11–12): 191–223.
- McFadden J. The conscious electromagnetic information (CEMI) field theory: B the hard problem made easy? Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2002 Aug; 9(8):45–6.
- Sheldrake R. Three approaches to biology. Part-1. The mechanistic theory of life. Theoria to theory. 1980; 14: 125–44.
- A Critical Analysis of Unusual Prey Predator Relationships with Regard to their Exclusive Evolutionary Advantages
Abstract Views :235 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Zoology, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak - 756100, Odisha, IN
2 Department of Physics, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak - 756100, Odisha, IN
1 Department of Zoology, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak - 756100, Odisha, IN
2 Department of Physics, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak - 756100, Odisha, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 11, No 39 (2018), Pagination: 1-8Abstract
Objectives: To study unusual prey-predator relationships and generalize them to include behavior reversals and to find out whether they are actually role reversals or mere misnomers. Methods: Meta-evolutionary Analysis of various cases of role reversal e.g. plant parasitism, plant Carnivory, prey-predator role-reversal and cannibalism to find out their exclusive evolutionary advantages for the species involved. Findings: Most cases of role-reversal are, strictly speaking, not role reversals at all. Rather, such unusual prey-predator relationship is part of their natural method of survival or reproduction. The nomenclature of role-reversal on the basis of just their relative size is thus not proper. Santalum, wrongly designated as an obligate ischolar_main-parasite is rather a self-sacrificing species for its evolution by purposive association without harming the host plants. Similarly, plant carnivory also is a kind of role-reversal, since plants are thought to be preyed upon by animals and not the converse. It is proposed that a proto-instinct has developed in these plants. Prey-predator role-reversals are studied most commonly under role-reversals, but we find that they may not be fit to be called role reversals at all, if that method is the part of the obligatory fulfillment of the survival and reproductive urges. Applications/Improvements: Generalization of role reversals to behavior reversals and their meta-evolutionary analysis.References
- Cohen JE, Pimm SL, Yodzis P, Salda-AJ. Body Sizes of Animal Predators and Animal Prey in Food Webs. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1993; 62(1):67-78. https://doi.org/10.2307/5483.
- Toledo LF, Silva RR, Haddad CFB. Anurans as prey: an exploratory analysis and size relationships between predators and their prey. Journal of Zoology. 2007; 271(2):170-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00195.x.
- Dawkins R, Krebs JR. Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 1979; 205(1161):489-511. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0081 PMid:42057.
- Evans DL, Schmidt JO. Insect Defence: Adaptive Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey and Predators. State University of New York Press; New York. 1990; p. 1-482. PMCid:PMC1257123.
- Lovei GL, Sunderland KD. Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annual Review of Entomology. 1996; 41:231-56. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.001311 PMid:15012329.
- Magalhaes S, Janssen A, Monserrat M, Sabelis MW. Prey attack and predators defend. Counterattacking prey trigger prental care in predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 2005; 272(1575):1929-33. PMid:16191599 PMCid:PMC1559880.
- Saito Y. Prey kills predator: Counter-attack success of a spider mite against its specific phytoseiid predator. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 1986; 2(1):47-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193354.
- Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 1989; 20:297-330. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001501.
- Dorn NJ, Mittelbach GG. More than predator and prey: a review of interactions between fish and crayfish. Vie et Milieu. 1999; 49(4):229-37.
- Palomares F, Caro TM. Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. The American Naturalist. 1999; 153(5):492-508. https://doi.org/10.1086/303189 PMid:29578790.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. The Ubiquitousness of PreyPredator Relationship (PPR), the Law of Purposive Association and Fundamental Questions in Evolution. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2018.
- Wizen G, Gasith A. An unprecedented role reversal ground beetle larvae lure amphibians and prey upon them. Plos One. 2011; 6(9):e25161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025161 PMid:21957480 PMCid:PMC3177849.
- Barkai A, McQuaid C. Predator-Prey role reversal in a marine benthic ecosystem. Science. 1988; 242(4875):62-4 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.242.4875.62 PMid:17757631.
- Choh Y, Ignacio M, Sabelis MW, Janssen A. Prey predator role reversals, juvenile experience and adult antipredator behavior. Scientific Reports. 2012; 2:728-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00728 PMid:23061011 PMCid:PMC3469038.
- Janssen A, Faraji F, van de Hammen T, Magalhaes S, Sabells MW. Interspecific infanticide deter predators. Ecology Letters. 2002; 5(4):490-4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.14610248.2002.00349.x.
- Seitz RD, Lipcius RN, Hines AH, Eggleston DB. Densitydependant predation, habitat variation, and the persistence of marine bivalve Prey. Ecology. 2001; 82(9):2435-51. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2435:DDPH VA]2.0.CO;2.
- Benton MJ. Progress and competition in macro evolution. Biological Reviews. 1987; 62(3):395-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1987.tb00666.x.
- Iyengar AVV. The physiology of ischolar_main parasitism in sandal (Santalum album Linn.) Indian Forester. 1965; 91(4): 246-56.
- Radomiljac AM, McComb JA, Pate JS, Tennakoon KU. Xylem transfer of organic solutes in Santalum album L. (Indian Sandalwood) in association with legume and non legume hosts. Annals of Botany. 1998; 82(5):675-82. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1998.0741.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. Role of evolutionary urge in epigenetics and Gene culture co-evolution: A metaevolution perspective. International Journal of Science & Technology. 2018.
- Darwin CR. Insectivorous Plants. John Murray; London. 1875. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.17335 https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.99933 PMid:17231073 PMCid:PMC1319125.
- Givnish TJ, Burkhardt EL, Happel RE, Weintraub JD. carnivory in Bromeliad Brocchinia Reducta, with a cost/benefit model for the general restriction of carnivorous plants to Suuny moist nutrient-poor habitats. American Naturalist. 1984; 124(4):479-97. https://doi.org/10.1086/284289.
- Givnish TJ. Ecology and evolution of carnivorous plants. Plant-Animal Interactions. McGraw-Hill; New York. 1989; p. 243-90.
- Ellison AM, Gotelli N. Energetics and the evolution of carnivorous plants-Darwin’s most wonderful plants in the world. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009; 60(1):9-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern179 PMid:19213724.
- Givnish TJ. New evidence on the origin of carnivorous plants. PNAS. 2015; 112(1):10-1. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1422278112 PMid:25538295 PMCid:PMC4291624.
- Ewert JP. Neuroethology of releasing mechanisms: prey catching in toads. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1987; 10(3):337-68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023128.
- Hatle JD, Salazar BA. Aposematic coloration of gregarious insects can delay predation by an ambush predator. Environmental Entomology. 2001; 30(1):51-4. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-30.1.51.
- Ewert JP. The visual system of the toad: behavioral and physiological studies on a pattern recognition system. The Amphibian Visual System: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Academic Press; New York.1976; p. 141-202.
- Pavlovic A, Singerova L, Demko V, Hudak J. Feeding enhances photosynthetic efficiency in the carnivorous pitcher plant Nepenthes Talangensis. Annals of Botany. 2009; 104(2):307-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp121 PMid:19454591 PMCid:PMC2710902.
- Nyffeler M, Maxwell MR, Remsen JV. Bird predation by praying mantises: a global perspective. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 2017; 129(2):331-44. https://doi.org/10.1676/16-100.1.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. A prelude to meta-evolution. International Journal of Science & Technology. 2018.
- Polis GA. The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1981; 12:225-51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.12. 110181.001301.
- Kadoi M, Morimoto K, Takami Y. Male mate choice in a sexually cannibalistic species: male escapes from hungry females in the praying mantid Tenodera angustipennis. Journal of Ethology. 2017; 35(2):177-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-017-0506-z PMid:29225403 PMCid: PMC5711982.
- Kudo K, Shirai A. Effect of food availability on larval cannibalism by foundresses of the paper wasp Polistes chinensis antennalis. Insectes Sociaux. 2012; 59(2):279-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0217-3.
- Suttle KB. The Evolution of Sexual Cannibalism. University of California; Berkeley. 1999.
- Welke KW, Schneider JM. Sexual cannibalism benefits offspring survival. Animal Behaviour. 2012; 83(1):201-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.027.
- Schwartz S, Wagner W, Hebets E. Males Can Benefit from Sexual Cannibalism Facilitated by Self-Sacrifice. Current Biology. 2016; 26(20):2794-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.010 PMid:27720621.
- Pfennig DW, Reeve HK, Sherman PW. Kin recognition and cannibalism in spadefoot toad tadpoles. Animal Behaviour. 1993; 46(1):87-94. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1993.1164.
- Klug H, Lindstrom K, Mary CMS. Parents benefit from eating offspring: density-dependent egg survivorship compensates for filial cannibalism. Evolution. 2006; 60(10): 2087-95. https://doi.org/10.1554/05-283.1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01846.x PMid:17133865.
- Dobzhansky T, Ayala AJ, Stebbbins GL. Evolution. WH. Freeman; San Francisco. 1977; p. 1-572.
- Simpson GG. Rates of evolution in animals. Genetics, Paleontology, and Evolution. Princeton University Press; Princeton. 1949; p. 205-28.
- Simpson GG. The Major Features of Evolution. Columbia University Press; New York. 1953.
- Huxley JS. Evolution: the Modern Synthesis. George Allen & Unwin; London. 1942.
- Huxley JS. Evolutionary processes and taxonomy with special reference to grades. Uppsala Universitets Arsskrift; Uppsala. 1958; p. 21-39.
- Simpson GG. The concept of progress in organic evolution. Social Research. 1974; 41(1):28-51.
- Williams GC. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press; Princeton. 1966.
- Stebbins GL. The Basis of Progressive Evolution. University of North Carolina Press; Chapel Hill. 1969.
- Rensch B. Biophilosophy. Columbia University Press, New York. 1971; p. 1-377.
- Schaeffer B. The role of experimentation in the origin of higher levels of organization. Systematic Zoology. 1965; 14(4):318-36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2411684 PMid: 5892256.
- Stanley SM. Macroevolution, Pattern and Process. W. H. Freeman; San Francisco. 1979; p. 1-332.
- Van Valen LM. A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory. 1973; 1(1):1-30.
- Thoday JM. Natural selection and biological progress. A Century of Darwin (ed. S. A. Barnett). George Allen and Unwin; London. 1958; p. 313-33.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. Methylation-Assisted Epigenetic Evolution and the Psycho-biology of Human Experiences. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2018.
- Stanley SM. Effects of competition on rates of evolution, with special reference to bivalve mollusks and mammals. Systematic Biology. 1974; 22(4):486-506.
- Stanley SM. Trends, rates and patterns of evolution in Bivalvia. Developments in Palaeontology and Stratigraphy. 1977; p. 209-50.
- Symbiotic Interactions, Law of Purposive Association and the +/+ Nature of all Co-Evolution
Abstract Views :228 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Zoology, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak − 756100, Odisha, IN
2 Department of Physics, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak − 756100, Odisha, IN
1 Department of Zoology, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak − 756100, Odisha, IN
2 Department of Physics, Bhadrak Autonomous College, Bhadrak − 756100, Odisha, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 11, No 43 (2018), Pagination: 1-12Abstract
Objectives: To investigate all symbiotic interactions and the resulting specific and diffuse co-evolutions to bring out the +/+ nature of all of them. Methods: Analysis of all symbiotic interactions in light of law of purposive association and competition as the fundamental factor behind all of them. Findings: All symbiotic interactions are driven by competition at the fundamental level ultimately leading to +/+ co-evolution. All competition, including that involved in mimicry and endosymbiosis, finally ends up in cooperation for gainful evolution. Speciation and diversification depend not only on competition strength and the intensity of the driving instinct for perpetuation. Evolution is all-pervading force acting continuously in and through all organisms towards their perpetuation and up-gradation to higher evolutionary strata through purposive association, even though the organisms themselves don’t precisely know or decisively undertake the exercise of such progressive evolution. A holistic vision of the organic wholeness of all life as giant self-evolving organism that includes all life-forms as its mutually interacting components emerges in the final analysis which can be extended to include biotic factors as well. Applications/Improvements: Meta-evolutionary analysis of symbiotic interactions based on law of purposive association for gainful evolution of species through competition.References
- Dimijian GG. Evolving together: The biology of symbiosis, part I, Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings. 2000; 13(3):217–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2000.1192 7677, https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2000.11927678. PMid: 16389385.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. The Ubiquitousness of PreyPredator Relationship (PPR), the law of purposive association and fundamental questions in evolution, Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2018; 11(32):1−11. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i13/122032, https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i32/131052, https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i5/120437.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. Role of evolutionary urge in epigenetics and Gene culture co-evolution: A meta-evolution perspective, Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2018; 11(32):1−10. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i32/131051 https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i13/122032, https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i5/120437.
- Darwin C. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray; 1859.
- Ehrlich PR, Raven PH. Butterflies and plants: A study in coevolution, Evolution. 1964; 18(4):586−608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2406212, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01674.x.
- Strong DR. Natural variability and the manifold mechanisms of ecological communities, American Naturalist. 1983; 122(5):636−60. https://doi.org/10.1086/284164.
- Benton MJ. Progress and competition in macroevolution, Biological Reviews. 1987; 62(3):395−98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1987.tb00666.x.
- Janzen DH. When is it Coevolution? Evolution. 1980; 34(3):611−12. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408229, https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04849.x. PMid: 28568694.
- Tripathy A, Kar SK, Mohanty AK. Impact of Chloroquine on drug resistance of local plasmodium falciparum malarial parasites, Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development. 2016; 7(4):146−49. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2016.00207.2.
- Janzen DH. Coevolution of mutualism between ants and Acacias in Central America, Evolution. 1966; 20(3):249−75. https://doi.org/10.2307/2406628, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1966.tb03364.x. PMid: 28562970.
- Champman JL, Reiss MJ. Ecology: Principles and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. PMid: 1349902.
- Kay KM, Reeves PA, Olmstead RG, Schemske DW. Rapid speciation and the evolution of hummingbird pollination in neotropical Costus subgenus Costus (Costaceae): Evidence from nrDNA ITS and ETS sequences, American Journal of Botany. 2005; 92(11):1899–910. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.11.1899. PMid: 21646107.
- Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A. Convergence, competition, and mimicry in a temperate community of hummingbirdpollinated flowers, Ecology. 1979; 60(5):1022–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936870.
- Cronk Q, Ojeda I. Bird-pollinated flowers in an evolutionary and molecular context, Journal of Experimental Botany. 2008; 59(4):715–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern009. PMid: 18326865.
- Stiles FG. Geographical aspects of bird flower Coevolution, with particular reference to Central America, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 1981; 68(2):323–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2398801.
- Schemske DW, Bradshaw HD. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkey-flowers (Mimulus), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999; 96(21):11910–15. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.21.11910. PMid: 10518550.
- Stein K, Hensen I. Potential Pollinators and Robbers: A study of the floral visitors of heliconia angusta (Heliconiaceae) and their behaviour, Journal of Pollination Ecology. 2011; 4(6):39–47.
- Gullan PJ, Cranston PS. The Insects: An Outline of Entomology. 4th Edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 291–93.
- Potter M, De Jong KA. Evolving Complex Structures via Cooperative Coevolution. Fourth Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming. San Diego: CA; 1995.
- Rader R, Bartomeus I. Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination, PNAS. 2016; 113(1):146–51. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517092112. PMid: 26621730, PMCid: PMC4711867.
- Abrams PA. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: Theory and evidence, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2000; 31(1):79−105. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.79.
- Woolhouse MEJ, Webster JP. Domingo E, Charlesworth B, Levin BR. Biological and biomedical implications of the coevolution of pathogens and their hosts, Nature Genetics. 2002; 32(4):569–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1202-569. PMid: 12457190.
- Nuismer S. Introduction to co evolutionary theory. New York: W.F. Freeman; 2017. p. 1−395.
- Van Valen L. A new evolutionary law, Evolutionary Theory. 1973; 1:1–30.
- Carroll L, Through the Looking-glass: And what Alice Found There. London: Macmillan; 1896. p. 42.
- Rabajante J. Red Queen dynamics in multi-host and multi-parasite interaction system, Scientific Reports. 2015; 5:10004. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10004. PMid: 25899168, PMCid: PMC4405699.
- Morran, LT, Schmidt OG, Gelarden IA, Parrish RC II, Lively CM. Running with the Red Queen: Host-Parasite Coevolution Selects for Biparental Sex, Science. 2011; 333(6039):216. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206360. PMid: 21737739, PMCid: PMC3402160.
- Anderson R, May R. Coevolution of hosts and parasites, Parasitology. 1982; 85(2):411–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000055360. PMid: 6755367.
- Schluter J, Foster KR. The evolution of mutualism in Gut Microbiota via host epithelial selection, PLoS Biology. 2012; 10(11):e1001424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001424. PMid: 23185130, PMCid: PMC3502499.
- Sandoval-Motta S, Aldana M, Frank A. Evolving Ecosystems: Inheritance and Selection in the light of the microbiome, Archives of Medical Research. 2017; 48(8):780−89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2018.01.002. PMid: 29366516.
- Canny GO, McCormick BA. Bacteria in the intestine, helpful residents or enemies from within? Infection and Immunity. 2008; 76(8):3360–73. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00187-08. PMid: 18474643, PMCid: PMC2493210.
- Burkepile DE, Parker JD. Recent advances in plant-herbivore interactions, F1000 Research. 2017; 6:1−119. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10313.1. PMid: 28232868, PMCid: PMC5302155.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. A critical analysis of unusual prey predator relationships with regard to their exclusive evolutionary advantages, Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2018; 11(39):1−8. https://doi.org/10.17485/ ijst/2018/v11i39/131270, https://doi.org/10.17485/ ijst/2018/v11i13/122032, https://doi.org/10.17485/ ijst/2018/v11i5/120437.
- Balile V, Moran JA, Le Moguedec G, Marshal DJ, Gaume L. A carnivorous plant fed by its ant symbiont: A unique multifaceted nutritional mutualism, PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(5):e36179. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036179. PMid: 22590524, PMCid: PMC3348942.
- Odum EP. Fundamentals of Ecology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1953. p. 1−165.
- Lidicker WZ. A Clarification of interactions in ecological systems, BioScience. 1979; 29(8):475–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1307540.
- Pasteur G. A classificatory review of mimicry systems, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1982; 13:169−99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.001125.
- Weiblen GD. Interspecific Coevolution. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences; 2003. p. 1−12.
- Rothstein SI. A model system for coevolution: Avian brood parasitism, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1990; 21:481–508. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.002405.
- Canestrari D, Bolopo D, Turlings TC, Röder G, Marcos JM, Baglione V. From parasitism to mutualism: Unexpected interactions between a cuckoo and its host, Science. 2014; 343(6177):1350−52. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1249008. PMid: 24653032.
- Skelhorn J, Rowland HM, Ruxton GD. The evolution and ecology of masquerade, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2010; 99(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.10958312.2009.01347.x.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. A prelude to meta-evolution, Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2018; 11(31):1−13. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i13/122032, https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i5/120437, https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i31/130098.
- Grant PR, Grant BR. Evolution of character displacement in Darwin’s finches, Science. 2006; 313(5784):224–26. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.1128374. PMid: 16840700.
- Pfennig DW, Martin RA. Evolution of character displacement in spade foot toads: Different proximate mechanisms in different species, Evolution. 2010; 64(8):2331–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01005.x.
- Losos JB. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: the ecology of adaptive radiation in anoles. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2009.
- Schluter D, McPhail JD. Ecological character displacement and speciation in sticklebacks, American Society of Naturalists. 1992; 140(1):85–108. https://doi.org/10.1086/285404. PMid: 19426066.
- Schluter D. Frequency dependent natural selection during character displacement in sticklebacks, Evolution. 2003; 57(5):1142–50. https://doi.org/10.1554/00143820(2003)057[1142:FDNSDC]2.0.CO;2, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00323.x. PMid:12836830.
- Vamosi SM, Schluter D. Character shifts in the defensive armor of sympatric sticklebacks, Evolution. 2004; 58(2):376–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01653.x, https://doi.org/10.1554/03-080. PMid: 15068354.
- Reimchen TE. Predator handling failures of lateral plate morphs in Gasterosteus aculeatus: Functional implications for the ancestral plate condition, Behaviour. 2000; 137(7):1081–96. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853900502448.
- Reimchen TE. Injuries on stickleback from attacks by a toothed predator (Oncorhynchus) and implications for the evolution of lateral plates, Evolution. 1992; 46(4):1224– 30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2409768, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb00631.x. PMid: 28564400.
- Marchinko KB, Schluter D. Parallel evolution by correlated response: Lateral plate reduction in three spine stickleback, Evolution. 2007; 61(5):1084–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00103.x. PMid: 17492963.
- Barrett RDH, Rogers SM, Schluter D. Environment specific pleiotropy facilitates divergence at the Ectodysplasin locus in three spine stickleback, Evolution. 2009; 63(11):2831–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00762.x. PMid: 19545262.
- Reimchen TE, Nosil P. Replicated ecological landscapes and the evolution of morphological diversity among Gasterosteus populations from an archipelago on the west coast of Canada, Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2006; 84(5):643–54. https://doi.org/10.1139/z06-036.
- Marchinko KB. Predation’s role in repeated phenotypic and genetic divergence of armor in threespine stickleback, Evolution. 2009; 63(1):127–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00529.x. PMid: 18803682.
- Maccoll ADC. Parasites may contribute to ‘magic trait’ evolution in the adaptive radiation of three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus (Gasterosteiformes: Gasterosteidae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2009; 96(2):425– 33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01123.x.
- Abrams PA. Adaptive responses of predators to prey and prey to predators: The failure of the arms race analogy, Evolution. 1986; 40(6):1229–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05747.x, https://doi.org/10.2307/2408950. PMid: 28563514.
- Lack D. Darwin’s finches. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 1947. PMid: 20264594.
- Grant BR, Grant PR. Fission and fusion of Darwin’s Finches populations, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Science. 2008; 363(1505):2821–29.
- Schluter D. The Ecology of adaptive Radiation, (Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution). 1st Edition. Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 1−296.
- Jablonski D. The interplay of physical and biotic factors in macro-evolution. Chicago: APA; 2003.
- Stanley SM. Macroevolution, Pattern and Process. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman; 1979.
- Stanley SM. Effects of competition on rates of evolution, with special reference to bivalve mollusks and mammals, Systematic Zoology. 1974; 22(4):486−506. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412955.
- Gould SJ. The paradox of the first tier: an agenda for paleobiology, Paleobiology, 1985; 11(1):2–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300011350.
- Gould SJ. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Belknap: press of Harvard University press, Cambridge; MA; 2002.
- Tripathy A, Pradhan RK. Methylation-assisted epigenetic evolution and the psycho-biology of human experiences, Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development.2018.
- Gause GF. The Struggle for Existence. 1st Edition. Baltimore, The Williams & Wilkins Company; 1934. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4489.
- Hardin G. The competitive exclusion principle, Science. 1960; 131(3409):1292–97. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 131.3409.1292. PMid: 14399717.
- Gómez JM. González-Megías A. Asymmetrical interactions between ungulates and phytophagous insects: Being different matters, Ecology. 2002; 83(1):203–11. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0203:AIBUAP]2.0.CO;2, https://doi.org/10.2307/2680132.
- Farrell BD. “Inordinate fondness” explained: Why are there so many beetles? Science. 1998; 281(5376):555−59. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5376.555. PMid: 9677197.
- Margulis L. Symbiosis in Cell Evolution. 2nd Edition. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1993. p. 1−452.